We work with clients across a variety of industries, ranging from the world's leading investment banks and FTSE 100 companies, to governments and high profile individuals.
Given the volatile and unfamiliar situations in which disputes can often occur, we give fast and commercial legal advice, presented to you in a clear and understandable way.
With a practice of over 600 lawyers based across Europe, the US, Russia, the Middle East and Asia we have the resources to handle the most complex matters. The flexibility of our international network ensures that we create the appropriate team for each assignment, tailoring our approach to suit your requirements.
We advise, at an early stage, on how to avoid getting into disputes. In situations that do become contentious, we have the experience and depth of knowledge to manage and resolve your cases efficiently and effectively with as little disruption and cost to your business as possible.
We are advocates of, and regularly use, alternative dispute resolution methods including mediation, expert determination, adjudication and bespoke processes. In situations when litigation or arbitration are the right course of action, we will defend your case vigorously.
We have been awarded Competition Team of Year at The Lawyer Awards 2015 for our work on a complex, multi-party cartel damages claim for National Grid.
Teamwork, tenacity and a refusal to accept ‘how things are done’ helped us to pursue one of England’s largest cartel damages claims.
In January 2007 the European Commission ruled that the companies that supplied it with a major component of its power substations had been operating a cartel. National Grid Electricity Transmission plc asked us to claim follow-on damages in the English courts to recover losses plus interest from those involved in the cartel.
The case began in November 2008 with a claim for £275m, making it the biggest action of its kind in England.
The European Commission ruled that a cartel existed, but decided nothing about its impact on National Grid. We needed to show that the illegal behaviour caused losses for our client, and also that it hadn’t simply passed these on to its customers through higher prices.
It was clear from the beginning that we would have to test many issues in court, and show initiative to get the right outcome for our client.
Along the way, our team established several ground-breaking rulings in the courts; three were particularly important, and set precedents for similar cases:
Our client's claim was settled in 2014, just before the trial was due to start.
Beyond the court rulings and the outcome we obtained for our client, this case has sparked a very open debate on significant points of legal process. In particular, the ruling on the disclosure of leniency material has had an important influence on the forthcoming EU Damages Directive.