Andrew Street

  1. People /

Andrew Street

Andrew Street

Partner

  1. People /

Andrew Street

Andrew Street

Partner

Andrew Street

Partner

London

T: +44 (0) 20 3400 3658

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Biography

Andrew is a Partner in the Firm’s Business & Commercial Disputes Team and advises on a wide array of complex commercial disputes. He routinely acts on cases with an international dimension, many of which involve conflicts of law issues between different jurisdictions. Andrew has experience in high value corporate and shareholder disputes, civil fraud, and complex trusts disputes.

Andrew also advises on matters involving reputation management, including actions for defamation, breach of confidence/privacy, and protection of data.

Andrew’s practice focuses on advising high profile public figures, financial institutions, public companies, and clients in the real estate funds and sport sectors.

Andrew has specific expertise and experience in sports disputes and contentious regulatory and disciplinary matters in sport. He is a member of the Judicial Panels for the LTA and England Boxing, is a contributing author to the textbook ‘Football and the Law’ (Bloomsbury publishing), has been published by The Times on sports law issues, and was ranked by Chambers for sports law in 2022 and 2023.

The Growth of Class Actions: What’s next?

Admissions

  • England and Wales

Related Practice Areas

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Sports & Entertainment

  • M&A Disputes

  • Crisis Management & Reputational Risk

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • California Consumer Privacy Act

  • Special Investigations

  • Investigations

  • Sports & Entertainment Contract, Endorsement & Celebrity Representation Practice

  • Anti-Doping Practice

  • Sports & Event Venue Real Estate Infrastructure and Operation

  • Naming Rights & Sponsorship Practice

  • Sports & Entertainment M&A Practice

  • Sports & Entertainment Litigation Practice

  • Sports & Entertainment Specialty Counseling Practice

  • Entertainment Industry Practice

  • Sports & Event Financing

  • Collegiate Sports Practice

  • Olympic & National Governing Body Practice

  • Professional Sports Team Practice

  • BCLP Data Breach Hotline

Related Insights

Insights
Feb 07, 2024

Showing anti-competitiveness the red card

The European Union’s Court of Justice (“ECJ”) went into the 2023 winter break in style, publishing a hat-trick of judgments (hereafter referred to as SuperLeague, ISU, and Royal Antwerp) regarding the application of competition law to the governance of sport. These judgments are an El Classico of sorts for sports and competition law aficionados, with far reaching implications for rule-makers (such as FIFA, UEFA, the ISU, national sports associations and other sports governing bodies), players, clubs, fans, and other sectors more generally. This article details the factual background of the judgments, before assessing in turn, key implications in terms of sports governance and competition law. The judgments (ISU and SuperLeague in particular) strongly affirm the application of competition law to the governance of sports, and may subsequently result in many sports governing bodies revisiting the content and application of their rules.  
Insights
Dec 19, 2023

Check Complete: Arteta decision confirms strong criticism might not be misconduct under FA Rules

Earlier this month, a Regulatory Commission issued a significant decision limiting the scope of liability for misconduct under the FA Rules. In dismissing the FA’s charge against Arsenal FC manager Mikel Arteta, the Regulatory Commission confirmed that subject to certain limits and in the right context, the rules of the game allow for criticism of decisions, even if expressed in strong terms. In this blog, we consider the implications of the ruling for the right to voice criticism within the bounds of the FA rules. The Football Association v Mikel Arteta
Insights
Feb 21, 2023

Catch me if you can: How the English Courts are adapting to remain an effective jurisdiction to combat crypto fraud

The English courts have sought to lead the way in adjudicating crypto-related disputes and other technological matters in an international context. Recent decisions have demonstrated the English courts’ willingness to assist victims of crypto theft, and the ability of the English legal system to adapt in order to remain an effective jurisdiction for cases involving crypto fraud. In particular, recent decisions have established that: Software developers may owe a fiduciary duty to owners of crypto; New jurisdictional gateways are effective to expand the English courts’ jurisdictionto allow claimants to secure information orders against non-parties based overseas; and Service out of the jurisdiction may be permitted where there is a theft of crypto assets originally located in England but subsequently transferred abroad.
Awards
Oct 20, 2022

Chambers UK 2023

Related Insights

Insights
Feb 07, 2024
Showing anti-competitiveness the red card
The European Union’s Court of Justice (“ECJ”) went into the 2023 winter break in style, publishing a hat-trick of judgments (hereafter referred to as SuperLeague, ISU, and Royal Antwerp) regarding the application of competition law to the governance of sport. These judgments are an El Classico of sorts for sports and competition law aficionados, with far reaching implications for rule-makers (such as FIFA, UEFA, the ISU, national sports associations and other sports governing bodies), players, clubs, fans, and other sectors more generally. This article details the factual background of the judgments, before assessing in turn, key implications in terms of sports governance and competition law. The judgments (ISU and SuperLeague in particular) strongly affirm the application of competition law to the governance of sports, and may subsequently result in many sports governing bodies revisiting the content and application of their rules.  
Insights
Dec 19, 2023
Check Complete: Arteta decision confirms strong criticism might not be misconduct under FA Rules
Earlier this month, a Regulatory Commission issued a significant decision limiting the scope of liability for misconduct under the FA Rules. In dismissing the FA’s charge against Arsenal FC manager Mikel Arteta, the Regulatory Commission confirmed that subject to certain limits and in the right context, the rules of the game allow for criticism of decisions, even if expressed in strong terms. In this blog, we consider the implications of the ruling for the right to voice criticism within the bounds of the FA rules. The Football Association v Mikel Arteta
News
Nov 10, 2023
BCLP names global group to partnership
News
Oct 19, 2023
Chambers UK Ranks BCLP in 41 practice areas and recognizes 74 lawyers
News
May 11, 2023
BCLP lawyer named to tennis judicial panel
Insights
Feb 21, 2023
Catch me if you can: How the English Courts are adapting to remain an effective jurisdiction to combat crypto fraud
The English courts have sought to lead the way in adjudicating crypto-related disputes and other technological matters in an international context. Recent decisions have demonstrated the English courts’ willingness to assist victims of crypto theft, and the ability of the English legal system to adapt in order to remain an effective jurisdiction for cases involving crypto fraud. In particular, recent decisions have established that: Software developers may owe a fiduciary duty to owners of crypto; New jurisdictional gateways are effective to expand the English courts’ jurisdictionto allow claimants to secure information orders against non-parties based overseas; and Service out of the jurisdiction may be permitted where there is a theft of crypto assets originally located in England but subsequently transferred abroad.
News
Feb 15, 2023
BCLP recognized in ‘The Lawyer’ Top 20 Cases of 2023
Awards
Oct 20, 2022
Chambers UK 2023
News
Oct 03, 2022
Lawyers Author Chapter in ‘Football and the Law’