HMRC has publishes a brief in response to the CJEU decision in Skandia (which said VAT should be charged on supplies from a US company to its Swedish branch). HMRC is still considering whether the UK needs to amend its VAT grouping rules. In the meantime it says businesses should continue to follow existing guidance. However, it might still be a good idea to VAT group a UK branch if you can. Keep reading to find out why.
EXPERT LEGAL INSIGHTS / VAT and Indirect Tax
The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has announced its decision in a VAT case which may lead to significant extra VAT costs where a headquarters supplies cross-border services to an EU branch, particularly in the banking and insurance sector. Until now, it was generally accepted that no VAT charge arose on such services. This is […]
This article is a guide for US businesses in relation to VAT issues in the UK.
In essence, value added tax (“VAT”) is a tax on personal consumption or use of goods and services. Businesses charge VAT when supplying their goods or services to individuals who bear the cost of the VAT charge; thus these individuals are taxed on their consumption of those goods and services as measured by their expenditure. The business, having collected the VAT from the customer, will then pay that VAT over to the tax authority.
Read this if:
• you sell any goods or services and charge VAT;
• make investments and use the income generated to fund your business; and
• pay investment managers to manage your investments.
You may be able to reclaim some or all of the VAT charged on the investment management fees you pay.
This is the second article in a six-part series called ‘Bridging the Atlantic: Why tax makes the UK Europe’s business gateway’, which focuses on UK tax issues that affect US businesses. You should read this if you are a US business that sells goods or services in the EU.
In the 2012 Autumn Statement, the Chancellor of the Exchequer confirmed plans (first announced in September 2012) to use of the public procurement process to deter tax avoidance and evasion. A discussion document and draft guidance for consultation followed in February 2013 and on 20 March 2013, in the 2013 Budget report, the government confirmed that the new policy would be introduced from 1 April 2013.
In The Royal College of Paediatricians the FTT held that the sale of a property subject to an agreement for lease was a TOGC even though completion of that agreement was conditional upon exchange of contracts for the sale.
Michael Wistow, Head of Tax, shares his thoughts on how this Budget is likely to be received in the City, if it will create a simpler UK tax code and highlights some of the more disappointing aspects of the announcements.
Apart from the leak the big headlines were a drop in the main corporation tax rate, new and improved reliefs to support SMEs and entrepreneurs, measures to help the UK investment management industry, a new tax regime for shale gas, a boost for investment in housing and infrastructure and some unexpected inheritance tax restrictions.
Central Government will be able to ban companies and individuals that have taken part in failed avoidance schemes from being awarded Government contracts. The rules concern all major suppliers to central Government, including defence, IT, building and infrastructure companies. Other public bodies will be encouraged to consider applying the rules. The far-reaching proposals are open for an unreasonably short consultation period ending 28 February.